December 21, 2004
O’TOOLE: PROPERTY TAX TASK FORCE’S RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE NO
FRAMEWORK FOR REAL SOLUTION
Assemblyman Kevin O’Toole today said that the Property Tax
Convention Task Force’s recommendation for a convention that cannot
address spending issues avoids addressing the single largest
component of the current property tax crisis and fails to charge the
Legislature with working immediately on a solution to the problem.
"The report issued today by the Task Force fails to provide the
necessary framework for a solution to New Jersey’s property tax
crisis," said O’Toole, R-Essex, Passaic and Bergen. "I am
disappointed that the panel refused to acknowledge in its report
that the Legislature has a constitutional responsibility to address
this problem now, through a special session if necessary."
O’Toole also noted that the report omitted any recommendation
that a property tax convention address critical issues such as
school funding, spending caps, state borrowing and the need to
eliminate government waste and fraud.
"Many of the underlying reasons for the current property tax
crisis are related to how governments at the state and local levels
spend and manage taxpayer dollars," O’Toole said. "Any property tax
convention that refuses to address the way government spends money
will fail to provide long-term relief."
Without addressing spending issues O’Toole said he fears the
convention will be limited to discussing possible tax increases.
"We heard testimony throughout this process that simply
increasing taxes or shifting the tax burden will not solve this
problem," O’Toole noted. "This approach has been tried in the past
and it never succeeds in providing any long-term relief."
A copy of O’Toole’s dissent to the task force report is attached.
#####
December 13, 2004
PENNACCHIO:
NEWARK WASTED FUNDS INTENDED FOR REVALUATION PROPERTY TAX RELIEF
Assemblyman Joseph Pennacchio today criticized legislation moving
through the General Assembly that would extend the life of a parking
and payroll tax in Newark created in 1999 to offset the impact of a
property tax revaluation, but that has instead been used for four
years to balance the city budget.
"Newark was given the authority to levy these taxes so that it
could provide property tax relief to citizens hit hard by the
planned revaluation," said Pennacchio, R-Morris and Passaic.
"Instead of providing property tax relief, Newark flagrantly
violated the law and squandered this $50 million each year on
increased spending."
In 1999 the Legislature passed the "Revaluation Relief Act" which
allowed Newark to levy a parking tax and an employee payroll tax.
These two taxes have brought in about $50 million annually for the
city, and is set to expire on December 30 of this year.
The law required that this revenue be used to provide tax
abatements to property taxpayers who were hit hard by the
revaluation – the first revaluation the city had conducted in 40
years. This money was instead used to fund the city budget, and an
October Superior Court ruling held that this money needs to be
returned to its intended purpose.
Pennacchio noted that the city has used a recent $200 million
windfall from a new airport lease deal with the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey to help build a new sports arena in downtown
Newark.
"The city wasted nearly $200 million that was supposed to go to
tax relief, and now is using another $200 million windfall to build
a sports arena," Pennacchio said. "If city officials had used sound
fiscal management the money now being used on the arena could have
been used for the city services funded with the money intended for
this much-needed property tax relief."
"The taxpayers shouldn’t have to bail out Newark every time the
city gets itself in fiscal trouble," Pennacchio concluded.
#####
December 9, 2004
McHOSE/GIBSON
INTRODUCE MEASURE TO STRENGTHEN AUTHORITY OF FISH AND GAME COUNCIL
In an attempt to correct the erroneous New Jersey Supreme Court
ruling on the proposed bear hunt, Assemblywoman Alison Littell
McHose and Assemblyman Jack Gibson today introduced legislation to
reinforce the role of the Fish and Game Council in managing the
state's wildlife.
"The Fish and Game Council is comprised of scientists, land use
experts, farmers, and sportsmen," said McHose, R- Sussex, Morris,
and Hunterdon. "They are all experts in their field of study and are
well equipped to make appropriate decisions with regard to our
State's hunting and fishing policies."
The Fish and Game Council recently authorized a second bear hunt
in New Jersey. Despite recommendations made by the Council, last
week, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an order to stop the
scheduled bear hunt. Their ruling also effectively gave Commissioner
Campbell veto power over the Council. The Court had ruled there was
no comprehensive policy on the management of black bears in New
Jersey.
Assemblyman Gibson disagreed with that conclusion. "The Fish and
Game Council, along with their biologists, have extensively
researched methods of managing the bear population, using examples
from across the country and around the world," said Assemblyman Jack
Gibson, R- Cape May, Cumberland, and Atlantic. "They objectively
reached the conclusion that a limited hunt was the best, most viable
method to maintain a healthy bear population and reduce bear-human
conflicts."
"The Supreme Court clearly overstepped their judicial function by
terminating the bear hunt," added McHose. "This recent court ruling
is further evidence of a systematic attempt to strip the Council of
its authority."
In its current form, the Council is an independent body of
experts that advises and makes recommendations to the director of
the Division Fish and Wildlife, the commissioner of the Department
of Environmental Protection, and the governor. However, Commissioner
Brad Campbell, as well as several Democrat legislators, have
suggested giving the DEP more oversight over the Council, thereby
giving the governor even more control over hunting and fishing. They
have also proposed changing the composition of the Fish and Game
Council.
"Under no circumstances should the role of the
Fish and Game Council be reduced," said Gibson. "The Council is
effective because it is apolitical. Any attempt to politicize the
commission would be detrimental to New Jersey's wildlife policy."
"Since its creation in 1945, the Fish and Game
Council has provided balanced and practical solutions to the often
complex issues surrounding wildlife management," McHose said. "Any
significant changes to the Council could have an adverse impact on
sport hunting and fishing."
The McHose-Gibson bill clarifies the Fish and
Game Council as the sole regulatory body of fresh water fishing,
hunting, and trapping. The measure also clarifies existing law to
require the Division of Wildlife and the Department of Environmental
Protection to implement the State Fish and Game Code as adopted by
the Council.
"We want to see black bears thrive in New
Jersey," concluded Gibson. "However, with more people living in
rural areas, we need to find a balance between nurturing wildlife
and protecting people. We feel the Fish and Game Council is the best
entity to find that balance."
#####
December 3, 2004
DeCROCE TO SIRES: ELECTION REFORM BIPARTISANSHIP REQUIRES BILLS
FROM BOTH PARTIES
Assembly Republican Leader Alex DeCroce today sent a letter to
Assembly Speaker Albio Sires expressing his disappointment that no
Republican election reform bills had been placed on the agenda for
consideration at Monday’s meeting of the Assembly State Government
Committee.
"I am puzzled by your decision to allow the Assembly State
Government Committee to meet on Monday and discuss an 18-bill
election reform package that does not exist, while reform bills
already introduced and sponsored by Assembly Republicans are not
included on the agenda," DeCroce wrote in his letter.
DeCroce said that Assembly Majority Leader Joe Roberts had
originally expressed his desire for this to be a bipartisan effort,
but that Roberts has failed to reach out to him to discuss the
package since the October press conference.
"How can we expect to regain the people’s trust or encourage
public involvement in the election process when we allow secrecy and
partisan advantage to stand in the way of a meaningful and
productive dialog?" DeCroce asks Sires in his letter.
DeCroce goes on to assure Sires that Republicans will take and
active role in Monday’s hearing and will place concrete proposals on
the table for consideration.
#####
December 2, 2004
FISCAL IMPACT
OF BILL GRANTING EXPANDED POLICE POWERS TO BRIDGE COMMISSION POLICE
QUESTIONED
Assemblymen Jon Bramnick and Brian Rumpf today raised concerns
about legislation that would grant expanded law enforcement powers
to Burlington County Bridge Commission police officers in an
apparent attempt to allow those officers to gain access to the
Police and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS) pension program.
"Even though the sponsors may have the best of intentions, it
would be irresponsible for us not to ask questions about the fiscal
impact of this change in the law," said Bramnick, R-Union, Morris,
Somerset, and Essex. "All of the state’s pension programs are
currently on shaky fiscal ground and this could put further stress
on the health of that pension system."
The bill, A-2798, is sponsored by Democrat Assemblymen Jack
Conners and Herb Conaway and it would allow Bridge Commission police
officers to make arrests anywhere in the state of New Jersey.
Currently these officers only have law enforcement powers within the
Bridge Commission’s jurisdictional lines.
It is possible that the expanded police powers may be used as the
basis for an application by the Bridge Commission officers to be
given access to the New Jersey Police and Firemen’s Retirement
System (PFRS) pension program. These officers have requested access
to the pension system in the past and were denied.
Bramnick noted that the unfunded liability in PFRS has been
growing dramatically in recent years. He pointed to an OLS report
that the PFRS unfunded liability had gone from a $151 million
surplus in June of 2001 to an almost $2.2 billion deficit in June
2003. This unfunded liability has now grown to near $5 billion and
covers three-quarters of the active members in PFRS.
"We need to know what impact this might have on the already
troubled PFRS pension system, but we also need to find out what
impact this will have on the Bridge Commission’s budget," said
Rumpf, R-Ocean, Burlington and Atlantic. "If the Bridge Commission
must pay as much as $2 million to create PFRS access for these
officers, it is reasonable to ask whether this could lead to a toll
increase on these bridges. These are all matters that should be
considered before final passage of this bill."
The Burlington County Bridge Commission controls the Tacony-Palmyra,
Burlington-Bristol, and Riverside-Delanco bridges.
Bramnick and Rumpf, members of the Assembly Law and Public Safety
Committee, raised these concerns during the discussion of A-2798 at
today’s hearing. The bill was released by the committee, but
Bramnick and Rumpf asked that these fiscal issues be resolved before
the bill is voted on by the full General Assembly.
#####
December 2, 2004
KEAN/
McHOSE INTRODUCE BILL THAT BANS THE APPEARANCE OF THE GOVERNOR IN
NONESSENTIALSTATE ADVERTISING
In an attempt to curb the abuse of state
advertising for political purposes, Assemblyman Sean Kean and
Assemblywoman Alison Littell McHose today introduced legislation
that bans the appearance of the governor in almost all
taxpayer-funded television, radio, and print ads.
"State-funded advertising is an important tool
that can be utilized to promote tourism, economic policy, and vital
government programs," said Kean, R-Monmouth. "Unfortunately, over
the years, governors from both political parties have taken
advantage of the system and have used this type of advertising to
promote their political agenda."
Over the past three years, the state has spent an
estimated $38 million on promotional television and radio
advertisements, as well as mailings featuring former Governor James
McGreevey. This included ads focused on tourism, business promotion,
auto insurance and the governor’s literacy program.
"The general public is savvy enough to recognize
this misuse of power," said McHose, R-Sussex, Morris, and Hunterdon.
"The McGreevey administration, with the blessing of the
Democrat-controlled Legislature, took this practice to an entirely
different level. It is essential that we do something now to prevent
any further abuse."
The measure bans the appearance of the governor in
nonessential state advertisement or promotional campaigns. The bill
permits the governor to only appear in ads related to the state
website, constituent communications, and emergency situations.
The legislation also creates a
nonpartisan, unpaid commission to establish parameters that
determine the essential ads which require the appearance of the
governor.
"The commission would have the
ability to require the governor to reimburse the state if it is
determined that an unlawful appearance occurred," added McHose.
"Establishing another degree of accountability only serves to ensure
advertising funding will be used for its intended purpose."
Assemblyman Kean and Assemblywoman
McHose conducted an exhaustive review of the advertising practices
of every department and state agency.
Kean last week criticized the
School Construction Commission for spending $500,000 on promotional
materials that prominently featured former Governor McGreevey.
"I sincerely believe the passage
of this bill will work to stop the politically motivated from using
taxpayer dollars on their personal public relations programming,"
Kean said. "Furthermore, I think this is a valuable way to curtail
wasteful state spending."
#####
December 1, 2004
MALONE SAYS
REVENUE PICTURE LOOKS BLEAK, CALLS FOR BUDGET COMMITTEE HEARING
Assembly Republican Budget Officer Joseph Malone
today asked why the Assembly Budget and Appropriations Committees
have not scheduled a meeting to discuss the state’s troubling
revenue shortfall and to meet with the executive branch on the
health of the current budget and what is being done to prepare for
next year’s budget.
"Borrowing $1.9 billion to balance the budget last year has
created a structural hole in next year’s budget process," said
Malone, R-Burlington, Ocean, Monmouth, and Mercer. "Now the Office
of Legislative Services says projected revenues have been
overestimated and that the state may be facing an even larger budget
hole."
Malone was referring to the recently released October Revenue
Report from the non-partisan Office of Legislative Services (OLS).
That report stated that "October was not a good month for State
revenue collections," and that "Most major revenue sources fell
below targets for the month, dragging year to date collections
through the first four months of the fiscal year below
expectations."
In addition, an OLS analysis conducted in August indicated that
New Jersey might be facing a $4 billion budget deficit for Fiscal
Year 2006.
"I don’t believe we can wait to begin discussing how to fix this
budget," Malone said. "We need to work with the new administration
on plans to take to mitigate the fiscal damage."
Malone said he sent a letter to Budget Chairman Louis Greenwald
in August asking for a hearing on the revenue situation, but that he
has yet to receive a response.
"I would recommend holding a hearings now, so we can begin to
work with the Codey administration on what needs to be done to fix
this situation," Malone said. "The sooner we begin to address this
budget problem, the easier it will be to construct a responsible
budget next year."
The Assemblyman went on to say that he is impressed with the
efforts of Governor Codey and his staff to reach out in a bipartisan
effort to take a fresh look at the state’s needs and financial
dilemma.
#####
December 13, 2004
PENNACCHIO:
NEWARK WASTED FUNDS INTENDED FOR REVALUATION PROPERTY TAX RELIEF
Assemblyman Joseph Pennacchio today criticized legislation moving
through the General Assembly that would extend the life of a parking
and payroll tax in Newark created in 1999 to offset the impact of a
property tax revaluation, but that has instead been used for four
years to balance the city budget.
"Newark was given the authority to levy these taxes so that it
could provide property tax relief to citizens hit hard by the
planned revaluation," said Pennacchio, R-Morris and Passaic.
"Instead of providing property tax relief, Newark flagrantly
violated the law and squandered this $50 million each year on
increased spending."
In 1999 the Legislature passed the "Revaluation Relief Act" which
allowed Newark to levy a parking tax and an employee payroll tax.
These two taxes have brought in about $50 million annually for the
city, and is set to expire on December 30 of this year.
The law required that this revenue be used to provide tax
abatements to property taxpayers who were hit hard by the
revaluation – the first revaluation the city had conducted in 40
years. This money was instead used to fund the city budget, and an
October Superior Court ruling held that this money needs to be
returned to its intended purpose.
Pennacchio noted that the city has used a recent $200 million
windfall from a new airport lease deal with the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey to help build a new sports arena in downtown
Newark.
"The city wasted nearly $200 million that was supposed to go to
tax relief, and now is using another $200 million windfall to build
a sports arena," Pennacchio said. "If city officials had used sound
fiscal management the money now being used on the arena could have
been used for the city services funded with the money intended for
this much-needed property tax relief."
"The taxpayers shouldn’t have to bail out Newark every time the
city gets itself in fiscal trouble," Pennacchio concluded.
#####
December
9, 2004
McHOSE/GIBSON
INTRODUCE MEASURE TO STRENGTHEN AUTHORITY OF FISH AND GAME COUNCIL
In an attempt to correct the erroneous New Jersey Supreme Court
ruling on the proposed bear hunt, Assemblywoman Alison Littell
McHose and Assemblyman Jack Gibson today introduced legislation to
reinforce the role of the Fish and Game Council in managing the
state's wildlife.
"The Fish and Game Council is comprised of scientists, land
use experts, farmers, and sportsmen," said McHose, R- Sussex,
Morris, and Hunterdon. "They are all experts in their field of
study and are well equipped to make appropriate decisions with
regard to our State's hunting and fishing policies."
The Fish and Game Council recently authorized a second bear hunt
in New Jersey. Despite recommendations made by the Council, last
week, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued an order to stop the
scheduled bear hunt. Their ruling also effectively gave Commissioner
Campbell veto power over the Council. The Court had ruled there was
no comprehensive policy on the management of black bears in New
Jersey.
Assemblyman Gibson disagreed with that conclusion. "The Fish
and Game Council, along with their biologists, have extensively
researched methods of managing the bear population, using examples
from across the country and around the world," said Assemblyman
Jack Gibson, R- Cape May, Cumberland, and Atlantic. "They
objectively reached the conclusion that a limited hunt was the best,
most viable method to maintain a healthy bear population and reduce
bear-human conflicts."
"The Supreme Court clearly overstepped their judicial
function by terminating the bear hunt," added McHose.
"This recent court ruling is further evidence of a systematic
attempt to strip the Council of its authority."
In its current form, the Council is an independent body of
experts that advises and makes recommendations to the director of
the Division Fish and Wildlife, the commissioner of the Department
of Environmental Protection, and the governor. However, Commissioner
Brad Campbell, as well as several Democrat legislators, have
suggested giving the DEP more oversight over the Council, thereby
giving the governor even more control over hunting and fishing. They
have also proposed changing the composition of the Fish and Game
Council.
"Under no circumstances should the role of
the Fish and Game Council be reduced," said Gibson. "The
Council is effective because it is apolitical. Any attempt to
politicize the commission would be detrimental to New Jersey's
wildlife policy."
"Since its creation in 1945, the Fish and
Game Council has provided balanced and practical solutions to the
often complex issues surrounding wildlife management," McHose
said. "Any significant changes to the Council could have an
adverse impact on sport hunting and fishing."
The McHose-Gibson bill clarifies the Fish and
Game Council as the sole regulatory body of fresh water fishing,
hunting, and trapping. The measure also clarifies existing law to
require the Division of Wildlife and the Department of Environmental
Protection to implement the State Fish and Game Code as adopted by
the Council.
"We want to see black bears thrive in New
Jersey," concluded Gibson. "However, with more people
living in rural areas, we need to find a balance between nurturing
wildlife and protecting people. We feel the Fish and Game Council is
the best entity to find that balance."
#####
December 3, 2004
DeCROCE TO
SIRES: ELECTION REFORM BIPARTISANSHIP REQUIRES BILLS FROM BOTH
PARTIES
Assembly Republican Leader Alex DeCroce today sent a letter to
Assembly Speaker Albio Sires expressing his disappointment that no
Republican election reform bills had been placed on the agenda for
consideration at Monday’s meeting of the Assembly State Government
Committee.
"I am puzzled by your decision to allow the Assembly State
Government Committee to meet on Monday and discuss an 18-bill
election reform package that does not exist, while reform bills
already introduced and sponsored by Assembly Republicans are not
included on the agenda," DeCroce wrote in his letter.
DeCroce said that Assembly Majority Leader Joe Roberts had
originally expressed his desire for this to be a bipartisan effort,
but that Roberts has failed to reach out to him to discuss the
package since the October press conference.
"How can we expect to regain the people’s trust or encourage
public involvement in the election process when we allow secrecy and
partisan advantage to stand in the way of a meaningful and
productive dialog?" DeCroce asks Sires in his letter.
DeCroce goes on to assure Sires that Republicans will take and
active role in Monday’s hearing and will place concrete proposals on
the table for consideration.
#####
December 2, 2004
FISCAL IMPACT OF BILL GRANTING
EXPANDED POLICE POWERS TO BRIDGE COMMISSION POLICE QUESTIONED
Assemblymen Jon Bramnick and Brian Rumpf today raised concerns
about legislation that would grant expanded law enforcement powers
to Burlington County Bridge Commission police officers in an
apparent attempt to allow those officers to gain access to the
Police and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS) pension program.
"Even though the sponsors may have the best of intentions, it
would be irresponsible for us not to ask questions about the fiscal
impact of this change in the law," said Bramnick, R-Union, Morris,
Somerset, and Essex. "All of the state’s pension programs are
currently on shaky fiscal ground and this could put further stress
on the health of that pension system."
The bill, A-2798, is sponsored by Democrat Assemblymen Jack
Conners and Herb Conaway and it would allow Bridge Commission police
officers to make arrests anywhere in the state of New Jersey.
Currently these officers only have law enforcement powers within the
Bridge Commission’s jurisdictional lines.
It is possible that the expanded police powers may be used as the
basis for an application by the Bridge Commission officers to be
given access to the New Jersey Police and Firemen’s Retirement
System (PFRS) pension program. These officers have requested access
to the pension system in the past and were denied.
Bramnick noted that the unfunded liability in PFRS has been
growing dramatically in recent years. He pointed to an OLS report
that the PFRS unfunded liability had gone from a $151 million
surplus in June of 2001 to an almost $2.2 billion deficit in June
2003. This unfunded liability has now grown to near $5 billion and
covers three-quarters of the active members in PFRS.
"We need to know what impact this might have on the already
troubled PFRS pension system, but we also need to find out what
impact this will have on the Bridge Commission’s budget," said
Rumpf, R-Ocean, Burlington and Atlantic. "If the Bridge Commission
must pay as much as $2 million to create PFRS access for these
officers, it is reasonable to ask whether this could lead to a toll
increase on these bridges. These are all matters that should be
considered before final passage of this bill."
The Burlington County Bridge Commission controls the Tacony-Palmyra,
Burlington-Bristol, and Riverside-Delanco bridges.
Bramnick and Rumpf, members of the Assembly Law and Public Safety
Committee, raised these concerns during the discussion of A-2798 at
today’s hearing. The bill was released by the committee, but
Bramnick and Rumpf asked that these fiscal issues be resolved before
the bill is voted on by the full General Assembly.
#####
December 2, 2004
KEAN/
McHOSE INTRODUCE BILL THAT BANS THE APPEARANCE OF THE GOVERNOR IN
NONESSENTIALSTATE ADVERTISING
In an attempt to curb the abuse of state
advertising for political purposes, Assemblyman Sean Kean and
Assemblywoman Alison Littell McHose today introduced legislation
that bans the appearance of the governor in almost all
taxpayer-funded television, radio, and print ads.
"State-funded advertising is an important
tool that can be utilized to promote tourism, economic policy, and
vital government programs," said Kean, R-Monmouth.
"Unfortunately, over the years, governors from both political
parties have taken advantage of the system and have used this type
of advertising to promote their political agenda."
Over the past three years, the state has spent an
estimated $38 million on promotional television and radio
advertisements, as well as mailings featuring former Governor James
McGreevey. This included ads focused on tourism, business promotion,
auto insurance and the governor’s literacy program.
"The general public is savvy enough to
recognize this misuse of power," said McHose, R-Sussex, Morris,
and Hunterdon. "The McGreevey administration, with the blessing
of the Democrat-controlled Legislature, took this practice to an
entirely different level. It is essential that we do something now
to prevent any further abuse."
The measure bans the appearance of the governor in
nonessential state advertisement or promotional campaigns. The bill
permits the governor to only appear in ads related to the state
website, constituent communications, and emergency situations.
The legislation also creates a
nonpartisan, unpaid commission to establish parameters that
determine the essential ads which require the appearance of the
governor.
"The commission would have
the ability to require the governor to reimburse the state if it is
determined that an unlawful appearance occurred," added McHose.
"Establishing another degree of accountability only serves to
ensure advertising funding will be used for its intended
purpose."
Assemblyman Kean and Assemblywoman
McHose conducted an exhaustive review of the advertising practices
of every department and state agency.
Kean last week criticized the
School Construction Commission for spending $500,000 on promotional
materials that prominently featured former Governor McGreevey.
"I sincerely believe the
passage of this bill will work to stop the politically motivated
from using taxpayer dollars on their personal public relations
programming," Kean said. "Furthermore, I think this is a
valuable way to curtail wasteful state spending."
#####
December 1, 2004
MALONE SAYS REVENUE PICTURE
LOOKS BLEAK, CALLS FOR BUDGET COMMITTEE HEARING
Assembly Republican Budget Officer Joseph Malone
today asked why the Assembly Budget and Appropriations Committees
have not scheduled a meeting to discuss the state’s troubling
revenue shortfall and to meet with the executive branch on the
health of the current budget and what is being done to prepare for
next year’s budget.
"Borrowing $1.9 billion to balance the budget last year has
created a structural hole in next year’s budget process," said
Malone, R-Burlington, Ocean, Monmouth, and Mercer. "Now the Office
of Legislative Services says projected revenues have been
overestimated and that the state may be facing an even larger budget
hole."
Malone was referring to the recently released October Revenue
Report from the non-partisan Office of Legislative Services (OLS).
That report stated that "October was not a good month for State
revenue collections," and that "Most major revenue sources fell
below targets for the month, dragging year to date collections
through the first four months of the fiscal year below
expectations."
In addition, an OLS analysis conducted in August indicated that
New Jersey might be facing a $4 billion budget deficit for Fiscal
Year 2006.
"I don’t believe we can wait to begin discussing how to fix this
budget," Malone said. "We need to work with the new administration
on plans to take to mitigate the fiscal damage."
Malone said he sent a letter to Budget Chairman Louis Greenwald
in August asking for a hearing on the revenue situation, but that he
has yet to receive a response.
"I would recommend holding a hearings now, so we can begin to
work with the Codey administration on what needs to be done to fix
this situation," Malone said. "The sooner we begin to address this
budget problem, the easier it will be to construct a responsible
budget next year."
The Assemblyman went on to say that he is impressed with the
efforts of Governor Codey and his staff to reach out in a bipartisan
effort to take a fresh look at the state’s needs and financial
dilemma.
#####
November 23, 2004
GREGG
GLAD TO HEAR ADMINISTRATION BELIEVES FEDERAL PRESCRIPTION DRUG
PROGRAM IS OFF TO A GREAT START
Assembly Republican Conference Leader Guy Gregg today said he was
encouraged by testimony from an official in the state division of
senior benefits who said that the transition to the new federal
prescription drug program in New Jersey has been seamless and has
led to millions of dollars in savings for the state.
"Despite dire predictions from some Democrat legislators, and a
negative letter sent in the days before this year’s presidential
election, it appears the transition to this program is working well
in New Jersey," said Gregg, R-Sussex, Morris and Hunterdon. "Our
state is saving money, and seniors are maintaining their coverage."
Gregg was commenting after a joint meeting of the Assembly
Federal Relations and Senior Issues committees. The joint committee
meeting was scheduled to take testimony on the implementation in New
Jersey of the new federal prescription drug program.
At the meeting, Kathleen Mason, assistant commissioner for the
division of senior benefits and utilization management, testified
that, "the automatic enrollment process into a preferred provider of
the Medicare Discount Card program has been a relatively seamless
transition with no disruption or loss of service to PAAD
beneficiaries."
Mason also testified that the new federal Medicare discount card
program has helped to save New Jersey’s PAAD program $33 million,
and that there should be a total cost savings of $90 million over
the 18-month transition.
"With the implementation of any new program you would expect some
bumps in the road, so it is good to hear that has not been the case
in New Jersey," Gregg said. "But I think it would be a good idea to
make sure that we use the savings from this program to make sure
that adequate coverage is provided to seniors should there be any
difficulties with the transition."
Gregg said he feared the Democrats would try to use the cost
savings to plug next year’s anticipated $4 billion budget hole, and
that may be why many Democrat legislators are seeking to downplay
the amount of savings the state will receive, despite evidence to
the contrary.
"These savings were intended to be used to provide seniors with
additional coverage – not to plug a budget hole created by
irresponsible borrowing and spending," Gregg said. "We must make
sure that this money is used to benefit seniors, not to clean up the
current budget mess."
#####
November 22, 2004
REPUBLICAN LEGISLATORS QUESTION
HEAD OF SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION ON SPENDING PRIORITIES
The three Republican members of the Assembly
Education Committee today questioned School Construction Corporation
chief John Spencer about recent reports that the school construction
program is running out of cash and reports in this weekend’s
newspapers about the questionable use of those funds.
Spencer appeared before the Assembly Education Committee to
answer questions from legislators on the school construction program
which despite an $8.6 billion allocation in 2000 is already said to
be running low on cash.
"I think it is time that we talk frankly about just how much this
program is going to cost state taxpayers," said Assembly Republican
Budget Officer Joseph Malone. "We have been given the responsibility
for implementing a court-ordered funding formula that will continue
to cost this state billions of dollars for years to come."
Malone, R-Burlington, Monmouth, Ocean and Mercer, asked Spencer
to account for how money is being spent on construction in the
Abbott Districts, and how much more money he expects to request from
the Legislature.
A recent story in the Asbury Park Press detailed how money
is being spent on some projects that are not even needed. The
superintendent of the Long Branch School District was quoted in the
November 14 edition of the Asbury Park Press as saying that
most of a $1.7 million renovation of the Gregory Elementary School
in Long Branch simply was not needed.
"These windows are brand-new; they are beautiful," Superintendent
Joseph Ferraina was quoted as saying. "But to tell the truth, we
could have done without them."
The Republican members of the committee also raised questions
about a number of glossy promotional newsletters and brochures that
were sent out – many of which have little to do with school
construction. One of these brochures features three color pictures
of former Governor McGreevey while touting his recent income tax
proposal and his book club.
That piece was mailed to 340,000 people at a cost of $42,800. It
was produced by a printing company that donated $5,000 in campaign
cash to McGreevey. Another promotional piece, The Diversity
Digest, includes legislative profiles – but not a single one
featuring a Republican legislator.
According to the Asbury Park Press today, the school
construction corporation spent more than $500,000 on these types of
materials.
"I think we need some answers as to what was the purpose of these
promotional brochures and why they were funded with money meant for
school construction," said Assemblyman Bill Baroni, R-Mercer and
Middlesex. "These brochures appear to be political pieces designed
to boost the former governor’s image rather than to advance the
goals of the school construction program."
Baroni, who questioned Spencer at this morning’s meeting of the
Joint Committee on Public Schools, said that it is unacceptable for
money to be wasted on these types of materials when the money for
much needed school renovations is drying up.
Assemblyman David Wolfe, R-Ocean and Monmouth, questioned the
pricetag of some recent projects highlighted in the news media
including a $100 million high school in Newark and a $100 million
high school renovation in Trenton.
"From the outside it appears that some of these pricetags are
much higher than they need to be," Wolfe said. "The taxpayers
deserve some answers as to why these projects cost so much, and what
type of oversight is in place to keep prices in line for these
projects."
#####
November 18, 2004
PENNACCHIO: CHRISTMAS COMES
EARLY FOR DEMOCRATS
Assemblyman Joe Pennacchio today said that New Jersey’s Democrat
leadership is displaying a complete lack of fiscal discipline by
distributing nearly $70 million in grants to support legislator’s
pet projects at a time when the state is in a deep budget hole.
"Christmas is coming early for some of these Democrat pet
projects, but it is the taxpayers who will end up with a lump of
coal in their stocking," said Pennacchio, R-Morris and Passaic. "At
a time when we are facing a $4 billion budget deficit, it might be
wise to hold off on distributing these funds."
Pennacchio was responding to newspaper stories from Wednesday
highlighting $70 million in spending projects included in the Fiscal
Year 2005 budget passed last June. While these projects are touted
as property tax relief programs, Pennacchio said that many of them
are little more than legislative pork mainly targeted to Democrat
controlled districts.
Among the projects being funded according to The Star Ledger are $125,000 for a dog park in East Brunswick, $350,000 for a
skateboard park in Woodbury, and new firetruck for Lawnside. The
Daily Record reports that $1 million will be spent for a new
library in Cherry Hill and another $2 million to refurbish the Walt
Whitman House in Camden.
"At a time when we are confronting a potential budget crisis I
think we need to do a better job of prioritizing," Pennacchio said.
"I have nothing against the dogs in East Brunswick, but maybe they
can wait for their park until a time when we aren’t being forced by
budget troubles to cut spending and staff in state departments."
"Republicans said when the Democrats passed their record-setting
budget in June that it was full of pork and unnecessary spending,"
Pennacchio said. "I think we can now see that our assessment was
accurate."
#####
November 9, 2004
MERKT SAYS
DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP IS MAKING IT CLEAR: NOTHING IS ABOUT TO CHANGE
IN TRENTON
Assemblyman Rick Merkt today said that New Jerseyans looking
for a change of direction and attitude in Trenton with the imminent
departure of Governor McGreevey may be disappointed to learn that
the Democratic Party feels no change is necessary.
"The public has a right to demand, and to expect, that the
Democratic Party would do some soul-searching after three years of
scandal and ethical lapses in Trenton," said Merkt, R-Morris. "But
the Democratic Party still appears to see no problem with the way
business has been conducted in Trenton under its leadership."
Specifically, Merkt was responding to comments by Assemblywoman
Bonnie Watson Coleman – the Democratic State Chairwoman – who was
quoted in The Star Ledger today as saying that the Democratic
Party doesn’t "need to change at all" and that the party "doesn’t
have an integrity issue."
"When the leader of your party has to resign in disgrace from the
governor’s office amid an endless string of corruption scandals, you
have an integrity problem," Merkt said. "When your party refuses to
advance meaningful campaign finance reform amid growing public
concern about pay-to-play, you have an integrity problem."
Merkt noted that the public has been bombarded for three years
now with headlines about corruption, ethics and legislative inaction
on reform.
"If the Democrats don’t believe they need to change the way they
have run Trenton, they aren’t listening to the public," Merkt said.
"They need to change, they have an integrity problem, and the
public’s patience in waiting for that change is wearing thin."
#####
November 8, 2004
DeCROCE
STATEMENT REGARDING McGREEVEY ‘LEGACY’
Assembly Republican Leader Alex DeCroce issued the following
statement today in anticipation of Governor James E. McGreevey’s
invitation-only farewell speech to his supporters:
"He can talk as much as he wants about reforming DYFS, while
children’s lives are still at risk. He can talk about reforming the
DMV, while drivers still wait on long lines at some inspection
stations. He can talk about ‘saving’ the Highlands from dangers that
don’t exist. He can talk about using millions and millions of tax
dollars for private medical research while ignoring the budget’s
structural deficit.
"But the reality is this governor disgraced himself and the
state. The only people who did exceptionally well under his
administration were his friends and campaign contributors.
"He will be remembered for promising to ‘change the way business
is done in Trenton" and then turning his back on comprehensive
attempts to end the political corruption and scandal that are the
hallmarks of his administration. He will be remembered for promising
to lower property taxes and then planting the seeds for an average14
percent increase in local taxes. He will be remembered for preaching
the merits of fiscal restraint, and then raising state spending 17
percent in a single year. He will be remembered for warning about
the rising level of state debt, and then using unconstitutional
deficit bonds to balance the budget and destroying our credit rating
in the process.
"It will take hard work and determination to clean up the
wreckage left by the McGreevey administration. The sooner he leaves,
the sooner we can begin to work with Senate President Codey to move
New Jersey forward."
# # # # #
November 5, 2004
KEAN WELCOMES
CODEY SUPPORT FOR LEGISLATION BANNING FEES FOR BOND CONSULTANTS
Assemblyman Sean Kean today said he was glad to hear of Senate
President Richard Codey’s support for his legislation prohibiting
the state from contracting with brokers and bond dealers who pay
finders’ fees to retain this business, but urged Codey to support
passage of his bill rather than issuing an executive order.
"We have already seen with pay-to-play that executive orders are
not the best way to make law," said Kean, R-Monmouth. "My bill would
accomplish exactly what Senate President Codey wants to do, but
without the limitations or constitutional concerns of an executive
order."
According to several newspaper stories Senate President Codey has
suggested that upon becoming acting governor in two weeks he may
issue an executive order that would prohibit financial firms
underwriting New Jersey bond deals from paying lobbyists and
consultants for helping them to get those jobs.
This is exactly what legislation introduced last March by Kean
would accomplish. His bill, A-2543, prohibits public issuers in New
Jersey form contracting with brokers, dealers and municipal
securities dealers that pay consultants finders’ fees to obtain or
retain municipal securities business with those issuers.
"The public correctly perceives there is something wrong with
politically connected individuals reaping huge financial rewards for
helping to land this state business," Kean said. "Our legislation
would put a stop to these questionable deals and hopefully with
Senate President Codey’s support we can get this bill signed into
law."
Kean said he hopes that Codey will urge Assembly Speaker Albio
Sires to move the bill in the Assembly.
#####
November 5, 2004
GREGG
CALLS ON STATE TO INVESTIGATE NEW MOTOR-VOTER REGISTRATION CONCERNS
Assembly Republican Conference Leader Guy Gregg today said the
state needs to investigate the procedures governing new voter
registrations in New Jersey following an election day where it
appears that record numbers of voters went before judges to ensure
ballot access.
"Luckily this year’s national election did not end up in the
courts, but there were clear warning signals in New Jersey that
something isn’t working properly," said Gregg, R-Sussex, Morris and
Hunterdon. "These voter registration concerns could be a very big
deal next year when there will be hotly contested gubernatorial and
legislative elections in the state."
Throughout northern New Jersey on Tuesday voters who claimed they
had registered long before the deadline found that they were not on
the voter rolls, and hundreds of these voters ended up having to go
before judges to argue that they were entitled to access to the
polls.
Gregg said he is concerned that many voters who did follow the
proper registration procedures may have been unfairly hindered in
their attempts to vote, and that others who didn’t register properly
may have used the confusion to fraudulently gain access to the
polls.
"Those people who are properly registered deserve the right to
vote without having to go before a judge," Gregg said. "We must make
sure that the integrity of the voting process is protected and that
the system is working properly to ensure fair ballot access."
Gregg said that the state Division of Elections should commence
an investigation to determine why there were so many glitches with
registrations on Election Day. The problem appeared to be that
information on individuals registered through motor-voter never made
it to boards of elections.
"We need to find out where the breakdown in communication was
between the motor-voter registrations and the boards of elections,"
Gregg said.
"Let’s make sure this scene is not repeated next year," he
concluded. "We have spent a lot of money on encouraging people to
vote and we should make sure that when they register properly they
have access to the ballot box."
#####
|